Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow Syndicated Solar

Solar Energy Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Capital Leases vs Operating Leases To Fund Solar Investments

 

Capital Lease vs Operating Lease

What is a capital lease?

Capital Leases offer Solar PV projects little incremental advantage over a conventional bank loan. 

  • Capital Leases address the up-front cost barrier in a similar manner to a traditional bank loan.
  • Leaves Tax Benefits with the site host (lessee), which can be undesirable if the lessee cannot effectively use them (many cannot). 
  • Consequently most lease financing of commercial PV installations has been done through Operating Leases which offer a broader spectrum of options to tailor to the Lessee's needs.

Learn More About Capital Leasing

 

What is a operating lease?

Operating Leases provide a number of potential advantages over the financing structures of Capital Leases

  • Operating Leases address PV’s up-front cost barrier by efficiently allocating the project’s tax benefits to those parties best able to use them, while having no direct impact the site host’s balance sheet. (Performance risk, along with the responsibility to operate and maintain the system, stays with the lessee/site host.)
  • The recent trend towards longer lease terms offers a potential for making PV projects economical in the face of stagnant system costs and declining state incentive levels.

Learn More About Operating Leasing

solar PV systemTo qualify as an Operating Lease, the following conditions must be met (otherwise, the lease will be considered a Capital Lease):

The lessor must make (and maintain throughout the lease term) a minimum unconditional “at risk” (equity) investment equal to at least 20% (10% under FAS 13) of the cost of the leased property.
At the end of the lease term, the leased property must have a remaining life of at least 1 year or 20% (25% under FAS 13) of the originally estimated useful life, whichever is greater.
If the lessee has an option to purchase the leased property, the option must be priced at no less than the fair market value of the leased property at the time the option to purchase the asset is decided upon.
The IRS requires that operating leases be “pre-tax positive,” meaning that they generate a positive return for the lessor prior to accounting for any tax benefits. 
Based on the more recent Revenue Procedure 2007-65, which found that the Section 45 production tax credit can be considered a cash-equivalent (and thus applied to positive financial return for the lessor) for such purposes with respect to wind projects, many tax investors in solar projects are now similarly assuming that the ITC can be factored into the “pre-tax positive” test on a cash-equivalent basis (Martin, 2008).

Agree?  Disagree?  Have Something to add?

Please leave your comments below.

Comments

I am an engineer working in Iran, trying to found an organization to extend solar industry in my country. I know regarding the wide opportunity and potential costumers and clients and also the energy benefits which has been removed and will end to a vaste need of clean and cheap solar energy , I will be succesful in this business , but I have a problem with the initial investment that need some money and I have restrictions in this matter. Leasing may help me , can you help me in this problem? 
 
I have to note that I have made some solar water heaters which have performed very well. 
 
My site is under construction and I know its not professional at all and in persian as language.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:33 AM by Babak Esmailzadeh Hakimi
Babak,  
I think you're not alone; the initial investment for solar energy appears to be a hurdle in many people's eyes and leasing does provide a solution. Solar is widely seen as a viable source of energy globally, and perhaps more importantly investors also see the potential. There are funds available in both the private and banking sector to invest in a solar project, but accessing that capital can be challenging. Feel free to contact me directly with specifics and I'll see if I can be of assistance.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:06 PM by Scott Wegs
scott@syndicatedsolar.com
Posted @ Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:07 PM by Scott Wegs
Dear Scott 
 
Thank you for your prompt and kind reply. As I stated before , a potentially good market exists in my country , due to absence energy management in Iran. Fortunately the energy benefits are step by step been removing, which cause a good motivation to look for cheap energy sources. I have worked on an solar water heater and am modifying it to maximize the efficiency of it and believe that I am on the right way. I dream rather on a solar company , to propagate the culture of solar design in buildings including active as well as passive solar systems and design. 
 
To support financially and technically this business I think to an american , european or english company , I have established a company (Soleil) in England and negociated with some banks , not myself but one of my friends from my part, it needs some time and effort to found it. After all I dont have a favorable financial situation to push effectively this business and I have to hurry up. In addition I need enthusiastic colleges and 
 
I will be out of my office for 2 or 3 days but I am eager to hear from you and any idea which will push this business. Please dont hesitate to ask me about any further information I could provide. Thank you again. 
 
Best Regards 
Babak
Posted @ Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:22 PM by Babak Esmailzadeh Hakimi
Search engines are not following the links in these comments.  
spammers are wasting their time!
Posted @ Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:03 AM by Spencer
The 'rub' is fair market value which is hard to determine/guestimate 5/6 years out. My guess is 20 % of module value only should be used after 5 years. What is your rationale or thinking on the subject? FMV is usually the deal breaker.
Posted @ Friday, April 15, 2011 8:47 AM by rich
This a single Family with two extra lots, The house was built in 2001, 12,000 sq ft an 1.5 ac and there two lots the not sub divided yet but can be and sell, The House price $2.700,000 and $450,000 each for the lot, This Property as a 4,ooo that need to be completed and also need a pool and some changes done and renovation cost $950.000
Posted @ Wednesday, February 22, 2012 7:28 AM by Andrew Richards
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics